Findings Regarding Irving Dardik’s Patient A


October 23, 2000
  1. Between on or about May, 1991, and on or about September, 1992, Respondent
    consulted and treated Patient A for her chronic Multiple Sclerosis ("MS")
    at her family’s homes in New York City and Long Island, at his office located
    at R.D. 1, Box 253, Hillcrest Drive, Great Meadows, New Jersey 07838, and
    at her home in Florida, both in person and over the telephone (T. 36; 42
    Resp.’s Ex. 4).

  2. In or about May, 1991, in his first telephone conversation with Patient
    A, Respondent told her that he had the answer to her MS, that he could
    cure her, and that he-could have her walking in a year (T. 33-34; 37-39;
    43; 46-47).

  3. In or about May or June, 1991, in another telephone conversation, Respondent
    told Patient A words to the effect that her myelin was not destroyed, but
    rather only thinned out, and that she could get it all back, and that he
    was not talking about a remission, but rather that his treatment would
    result in a cure (T. 34-35; 196-98).

  4. Patient A first met Respondent in person on or about June 12, 1991
    at her sister JB’s apartment, in New York City (T. 36; .*,.e) . In attendance
    at this meeting were Patient A, Respondent, and Michelle Morelli Weiss
    ("Michelle") , one of Respondent’s therapists (T. 37). For portions
    of this meeting, JB was able to overhear the conversation, although she
    was not present in the room (T. 339). At this meeting, Respondent again
    told Patient A that he would have her walking normally again within a year,
    and that his wavenergy program was not only curing MS, but also cancer
    and ALS (T. 39; 339; 380; Resp.’s Ex. D) . He also told Patient A that
    her condition would never again be as bad as when she started treatment
    with Respondent and that she would be better than ever (T. 38; 20607; 209-10).

  5. At this meeting, Respondent explained his wavenergy program, and described
    how it would work to activate the Respondent’s immune system through cycles
    of various exercises and periods of relaxation, which would change the
    flat linear waves of ill patients into healthy oscillating waves (T. 37;
    39; 109-10).

  6. He also described how he would administer the program and monitor Patient
    A’s progress through recording and analyzing changes in her heart rate,
    which would be captured through a special Polar brand watch and communicated
    daily to the Respondent via computer (T. 59-61; 91-92; Resp. Ex. D at 131).

  7. At this meeting with Patient A, Respondent did not physically examine
    her, nor did he take a baseline reading of her heart rate. Respondent only
    asked Patient A to walk so that he could observe her (T. 39; 46; 252-53;
    257-60; 1330-31).

  8. At this meeting, Respondent did not take a history of Patient A (T.
    253; 257-58). Prior to this time, Patient A sent Respondent some of her
    medical records on her own initiative, but Respondent did not contact her
    other treating physicians (T. 35-36; 253; 258; 332).

  9. At the June 12, 1991 meeting, Respondent told Patient A that the fee
    for the program would be $100,000 for one year’s treatment, and that this
    fee was more expensive than usual, because she was the equivalent of three
    patients, and needed "hands-on" attention, constant care and
    supervision (T. 43-44; 191-93, 340-41; Resp. Ex. D at p. 132).

  10. Respondent also told Patient A that he would personally pay constant
    attention to her, that she would also be treated by his therapist Michelle
    and that he would not be able to take on new patients because he would
    be treating her so intensively (T. 43-44; 49; 99-100; 192). Respondent
    further told Patient A that she was a priority case, and that she would
    get sick of seeing him and his therapist (T. 39; 45; 340; 370).

  11. On or about June, 1991, Patient’s A expectation was that Respondent
    would be personally treating her (T. 45; 74).

  12. on June 12, 1991, Patient A told Respondent that she used marijuana
    at night to reduce spasticity and temperature (T. 42-43), and that her
    family was aware of this (T. 29; 216).

  13. On or about June 14, 1991, Patient A bought a Polar watch from Respondent
    and commenced treatment with the wavenergy program (T. 59-62; 220-21).
    She also bought a variety of other equipment on Respondent’s instructions,
    including a computer to transmit data and answer a questionnaire on a daily
    basis (T. 48; 90-92; 255-56; Pet.’s Ex. 29; 30; Resp.’s Ex. D at p. 132-33).

  14. On or about June 14, 1991, Respondent told Patient A that he would
    put the MS Society out of business, and that he believed he would win the
    Nobel Prize (T. 63-64; 66; 233).

  15. In a telephone conversation with JB in or about June 1991, Respondent
    told her he would cure Patient A (T. 63; 344-45); that his fee was so high
    because she was the equivalent of three patients; and that he would have
    to be "hands-on" with her five days a week (T. 343; 375).

  16. In or about June, 1991 at Respondent’s instruction, JB called Respondent’s
    wife and business manager, Allison Dardik, to discuss the fee (T. 345-48).
    A payment schedule was later worked out, with the $100,000 paid over a
    seven month period (T. 286-88; Pet.’s Exs. 6, 7, 19).

  17. No written contract concerning the wavenergy program was ever agreed
    to or signed by Patient A or her representatives (T. 315-16). In July,
    1991, Respondent sent a draft contract to Patient A and/or Patient A’s
    representatives which contained terms contradicting what he had previously
    told Patient A about the nature and efficacy of his treatment, in particular,
    that no cure was guaranteed and that the therapy was termed experimental
    (T. 167; 170-74; 289; 308-09; 334-35; Resp.’s Exs. B, F).

  18. On or about June 24, 1991, Respondent met with and told Patient A’s
    mother that Patient A would never be worse, and that he would have Patient
    A walking by March, 1992 (T. 283; 300; 302; 31819; 328; 332-33).

  19. Between June, 1991, and September 1992, Patient A fully participated
    in the wavenergy program (T. 55-58; 79-80; 89; 95; 117-18; 154; 360-61;
    390).

  20. Although there were other components, such as nutritional guidance
    and the taking of cold showers and sleeping at prescribed times, the bulk
    of Patient A’s treatment consisted of her being given daily target heart
    rate numbers by Respondent’s therapists, over the telephone and in person,
    with Patient A achieving these target heart rate numbers through cycles
    of exercise and relaxation and transmitting the data recorded by the Polar
    heart rate watch via computer to Respondent’s office (T.49; 55-58; 66-67;
    71; 75; 80; 90-97; 117-18).

  21. From on or about mid-June 1991, through on or about August, 1991, Patient
    A resided at JB’s home in New York City (T. 70). Respondent visited Patient
    A no more than 5 times during this time period, and spent an average of
    one hour on these visits (T. 71-73). During this time period, Respondent
    spoke on the phone with her approximately daily until the first payment
    of $50,000 was made, and twice weekly thereafter (T. 81-83). During this
    time period, Respondent’s therapist visited Patient A approximately 3-5
    times per week for 2-3 hours per visit, and spoke with her nightly on the
    telephone (T. 71; 351).

  22. From on or about September, 1991 through on or about October, 1991,
    Patient A resided in Lawrence, Long Island (T.70; 83). This move was discussed
    and approved by Respondent (T. 83; 219-20). Respondent visited Patient
    A no more than 4 times during this time period, usually at the insistence
    of Patient A, and for an average of four hours per visit (T. 84-86; 88-89;
    98-101; 22728).

  23. During this time period Respondent spoke on the phone with Patient
    A occasionally, usually when there was perceived good news, but not when
    things were going badly (T. 82; 86; 100-01). During this time period, Respondent’s
    therapist visited Patient A approximately 3-4 times per week, and spoke
    with her often (T. 8687).

  24. In or about October 1991, Respondent communicated in a letter to Patient
    A’s mother words to the effect that he was curing Patient A’s Multiple
    Sclerosis (T. 293; Pet. Is Ex. 9). In this letter, Respondent also said
    he would visit Patient A periodically when she moved to Florida (Pet. I
    s Ex. 9, Resp’s Ex. D at p. 14 1) .

  25. From on or about November, 1991, through on or about April, 1992, Patient
    A resided in Orlando, Florida (T.83;. 110; 116). Patient A discussed this
    move with Respondent and received his approval prior to moving (T. 110;
    231). During this time period, Respondent visited Patient A one time, a
    two day period during which he worked with Patient A for a total of a few
    hours (T. 111-14). While Patient A was in Florida, Respondent spoke on
    the phone with her occasionally (T. 129-30).

  26. In or around November -January, 1991-2, Patient A was able to walk
    unassisted for the first time since 1989. This fact was, publicized in
    the local newspapers (T. 127; Resp’s Ex. E).

  27. In or about December, 1991, Patient A sent Respondent a letter stating
    she was confident he would cure her (T. 118-19; Pet.’s Ex. 10). Respondent
    did not answer the letter and did not try to dissuade her of her belief
    ((T. 125).

  28. In or about January, 1991, Respondent told Patient A he would send
    Michelle to see her every other week (T.128). Subsequent to January 1991,
    Patient A was seen a total of at most 4 times for approximately 3 days
    each time, and was telephoned nightly by the therapist (T. 114; 117).

  29. In or about February or March, 1991, Patient A placed several telephone
    calls to Respondent, to complain of fatigue and lack of strength (T. 130;
    154). Respondent did not return the calls (T. 130, 601).

  30. Patient A moved back to Long Island in or about April, 1992, and resided
    there until the end of her treatment in or about August, 1992 (T. 131-32).
    During this time period Respondent did not visit Patient A in Long Island,
    and spoke with her only occasionally on the telephone (T. 131-32). During
    this time period, various therapists visited Patient A several times a
    week and spoke with her by telephone (T. 132-33). By this time, Respondent
    had taken on several new patients (T. 87; 98-99; 19092).

  31. Patient A last saw Respondent in August, 1992, when she went to his
    home in New Jersey and stayed at a cottage there for what was supposed
    to be a period of intensive treatment with him (T. 134-35; 137; 240). While
    Patient A was there for five days, Respondent spent less than five hours
    with her (T. 137-41).

  32. Since the early spring of 1992, Patient A’s physical condition has
    deteriorated (T. 153-54; 199-201).

  33. Respondent admitted that he did not keep medical records or take any
    notes about Patient A, or any of the patients herein. Rather, he testified,
    for all patients he only kept records concerning the wavenergy program,
    which records consist of graphs, patient questionnaires, and target heart
    rate numbers (T. 1841).
Conclusions
  1. Respondent held himself out to Patient A as a physician, with a record
    of achievements in vascular surgery and the Olympics Sports Medicine program.
    Respondent’s reputation was an important factor relied on by Patient A
    in choosing to participate in the wavenergy program.

  2. Respondent told Patient A that he would cure her multiple Sclerosis
    through his wavenergy program, for which he charged her $100,000. He told
    her this fee was based on the fact that he personally would be treating
    Patient A intensively and would limit taking on other patients. He intentionally
    misrepresented to Patient A the extent he would be personally involved
    in her care, and did not devote the amount of time to her that Patient
    A expected, based on the statements he had made to her.

  3. Patient A was not cured of her multiple sclerosis.
  4. Respondent did not take an adequate medical history, nor conduct a
    proper physical examination of Patient A, and did not maintain adequate
    medical records for Patient A. This failure represented a departure from
    competent medical practice.

  5. Respondent did not reveal personally identifiable facts, data or information
    obtained from Patient A to other patients, or about other patients to Patient
    A.