HAMMETT


Disciplinary Action against Randall Hammett, D.C. (2004)

Randall J. Hammett, D.C., who practices in Kenosha, Wisconsin, has been disciplined by the Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board three times: In 1992, he was charged with billing improperly and doing unnecessary diagnostic and treatment procedures. The case was settled with a order under which he agreed to revisee his billing system, take additional courses in tradiology, and pay $5,590 for costs of the State’s investigation. In 2003, he was ordered to stop advertising himself as “most trusted,” “most recognized,” “chiropractic expert” or using any other language that implied professional superiority. In 2004, as shown below, the board issued an order under which he was reprimanded, must take a course in chiropractic recordkeeping, and would be subject to random record audits during the following two years, …

Continue Reading >

Disciplinary Action against Randall Hammett, D.C. (1992)

Randall Hammett, D.C., who practices in Kenosha, Wisconsin, has been disciplined by the Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board three times: In 1992, he was charged with billing improperly and doing unnecessary diagnostic and treatment procedures. The case was settled with an order (shown below) under which he agreed to revisee his billing system, take additional courses in tradiology, and pay $5,590 for costs of the State’s investigation. In 2003, he was ordered to stop advertising himself as “most trusted,” “most recognized,” “chiropractic expert” or using any other language that implied professional superiority. In 2004, the board issued an order under which he was reprimanded, must take a course in chiropractic recordkeeping, and would be subject to random record audits during the following two years, and must …

Continue Reading >

Disciplinary Action against Randall Hammett, D.C. (2003)

Randall Hammett, D.C., who practices in Kenosha, Wisconsin, has been disciplined by the Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board three times: In 1992, he was charged with billing improperly and doing unnecessary diagnostic and treatment procedures. The case was settled with a order under which he agreed to revisee his billing system, take additional courses in tradiology, and pay $5,590 for costs of the State’s investigation. In 2003, as shown below, he was ordered to stop advertising himself as “most trusted,” “most recognized,” “chiropractic expert” or using any other language that implied professional superiority. In 2004, the board issued an order under which he was reprimanded, must take a course in chiropractic recordkeeping, and would be subject to random record audits during the following two years, and …

Continue Reading >