Department of Health and Human Services
Public Health Service
200 C St SW
November 9, 2001
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
R. Scot Hunter, CEO
300 Tamal Plaza #220
Corte Madera, CA 94925
Ref. No. ONPLDS-03-02
Dear Mr Hunter:
This letter is in reference to your firm’s marketing of products as dietary supplements. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed labeling found on your website at the Internet address www.sciencebasedhealth.com and has determined that the products MaculaRx™ and MaculaRx Plus™ are promoted using statements that suggest that they are intended for use in treating diseases of the eye.
The claims observed on your website include, among others:
- “MaculaRx™ and MaculaRx Plus™; are state-of-the-art, synergistic multi-nutrient combinations designed to address different aspects of age-related degenerative conditions of the human eye. MaculaRx™ is designed for patients diagnosed in the early stages of macular degeneration. MaculaRx Plus™ is a therapeutic formulation for patients in the later stages of macular degeneration.”
- “MaculaRx™ and MaculaRx Plus™ are effective tools that may help reverse symptoms of macular degeneration and other eye disorders.”
Your products MaculaRx™ and MaculaRx Plus™ would ordinarily be considered dietary supplements. Because your labeling includes statements which represent or suggest that the products are intended to be used in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, the products are drugs within the meaning of section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 USC 321(g)(1)(B)]. FDA has no information that your products are generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced conditions and therefore, they also are “new drugs” as described in section 201(p) of the Act [21 USC 321(p)]. New drugs may not be legally marketed in the U.S. without an approved New Drug Application from FDA as described in section 505(a) of the Act [21 USC 355(a)].
These products are also misbranded within the meaning of section 502(a) of the Act because their labeling is false and misleading in that they suggest that there is evidence that these products are safe and effective for their intended use, when, in fact, this has not been established. These products are further misbranded within the meaning of section 502(f)(1) of the Act [21 USC 352(f)(1)] because their labeling fails to bear adequate directions for their intended uses.
This letter does not represent a complete review of your Internet website nor other product labeling or promotional materials, including immediate container labels, product brochures, product catalogs, product flyers, newsletters, and advertisements. It is your responsibility to ensure that all products distributed by your firm meet the requirements of the Act and its implementing regulations.
We request that you notify this office in writing within 15 days of receipt of this letter, of the specific steps you have taken or plan to take to correct the stated violations. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in an enforcement action being initiated without further notice. The Act provides for seizure of illegal products and/or injunction against the manufacturer and/or distributor of illegal products.
Please send your reply to the Food and Drug Administration, Attention: Andrew H. Paeng, Compliance Officer, Division of Compliance and Enforcement, ONPLDS, 200 C St SW, Washington, DC 20204. If you have any questions concerning any issue in this letter, please contact Mr Paeng at 202-690-0437.
John B. Foret, Jr.
Director, Division of Compliance and Enforcement
This page was posted on August 20, 2006.