Index to “Fad” Diagnoses

The American Heritage Dictionary defines “fad” as “a fashion that is taken up with great enthusiasm for a brief period of time; a craze.” At least 40 diagnostic labels classifiable as fads have been in vogue during the past fifty years. Some refer to actual disease (which the patients do not have), whereas others are not recognized by the scientific community. Some unscientific practitioners apply one or more of these diagnoses to almost every patient they see. In many cases, they use nonstandard laboratory tests to “diagnose” them and recommend “dietary supplements” or “detoxification” to treat them. In a few cases, the “diagnoses” have been concocted by marketers of dietary supplements or devices.

Click here for an overview of fad diagnoses.

Not Scientifically Defined or Recognized

These alleged conditions differ greatly from those of medically recognized diseases such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and coronary heart disease, each of which is associated with a clear-cut history, physical findings, and laboratory tests. With these, however, the range of symptoms is virtually endless and typically does not correlate with physical findings or science-based laboratory tests.

• Amalgam toxicity (also called “mercury illness”)
• Candidiasis hypersensitivity (“yeast allergy”)
• Cavitational osteopathosis: Also called neuralgia-inducing cavitational osteonecrosis (NICO)
• Chronic inflammatory response syndrome (CIRS)
• Electrical hypersensitivity (also called electromagnetic hypersensitivity)
• Enzyme deficiency (generalized)
• Gulf War syndrome
• Leaky gut syndrome
• Male menopause (link to another site)
• Mercury efflux disorder
• Morgellon’s disease
• Multiple chemical sensitivity
• Pyroluria (link to another site)
• Relative nutritional defiency (RND) of neurotransmitters
• Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)
• Sick building syndrome (link to another site)
• Vertebral subluxation complex
• Wilson’s syndrome

Scientifically Recognized But Inappropriately Diagnosed

These conditions are recognized as diseases but are said to be present when they are not. Some are common, whereas others are rare. Most can be appropriately diagnosed with the help of laboratory tests. However, some doctors base their diagnoses on inappropriate tests or do no testing.

• Adrenal insufficiency (sometimes called “adrenal fatigue”)
• Chronic fatigue syndrome
• Food allergies and sensitivities
• Gadolinium toxicity
• Gluten sensitivity
• Growth hormine deficiency
• Heavy metal toxicity
• Hypoglycemia
• Hypothyroidism
• Lyme disease
• Neurotransmitter deficiency
• Parasites (including so-called “rope worms”)
• Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)
• Porphyria
• Post-traumatic stress disorder
• “Toxic mold”

Nonexistent Conditions Concocted By Product Marketers

• Magnetic deficiency
• Oxygen deficiency disease

Dubious Psychological Labels

• Attachment disorder
• Indigo child
• Nature deficit disorder
• Sensory integration disorder (SID) (also called sensory processing disorder (SPD)

Recipe for a New Fad Disease Pick any symptoms—the more common the better. Pick any disease—real or invented. (Real diseases have more potential for confusion because their existence can’t be denied.) Assign lots of symptoms to the disease. Say that millions of undiagnosed people suffer from it. Pick a few treatments. Including supplements will enable health food stores and chiropractors to get in on the action. Promote your theories through books and talk shows. Don’t compete with other fad diseases. Say that yours predisposes people to the rest or vice versa. Claim that the medical establishment, the drug companies, and the chemical industry are against you. State that the medical profession is afraid of your competition or trying to protect its turf. If challenged to prove your claims, say that you lack the money for research, that you are too busy getting sick people well, and that your clinical results speak for themselves.